Morning Glory: The VP Debate is an Example of Kamala Harris’s Horrible Judgment When it Comes to Picking Staff
The recent Vice Presidential debate between Kamala Harris and Mike Pence shed light not only on the candidates themselves but also on the individuals they choose to surround themselves with. As the running mate of Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden, Kamala Harris’s choice of staff is crucial in shaping her public image and policy positions. However, the debate highlighted a concerning pattern of questionable judgment in Harris’s team selection.
One instance that stood out during the debate was the performance of moderator Susan Page, the Washington Bureau Chief for USA Today. Page has faced criticism for her handling of the debate, including interruptions, bias, and failure to moderate effectively. Her biased questioning and failure to hold both candidates equally accountable raised concerns about the integrity of the debate.
While Harris cannot be held responsible for the actions of the debate moderator, her team’s decision to participate in an event moderated by someone with a history of bias is concerning. As a seasoned politician and former prosecutor, Harris should have been more discerning in selecting events and platforms that uphold fairness and impartiality.
Another troubling aspect of Harris’s staff selections was the abrupt cancellation of the planned October 15th debate between Harris and Pence. The decision was made following President Trump’s refusal to participate in a virtual format, citing concerns about the fairness and bias of virtual debates. Harris’s team’s quick agreement to cancel the debate instead of exploring alternative formats or venues raised questions about their commitment to engaging in constructive dialogue and allowing voters to make informed decisions.
Furthermore, Harris’s association with key advisors and supporters, such as Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and Senator Bernie Sanders, has raised concerns about the alignment of her policy positions with the Democratic party’s progressive wing. While it is crucial for a candidate to appeal to a broad base of supporters, Harris must ensure that her policies reflect the interests and values of a diverse electorate.
In conclusion, the VP debate served as a window into Kamala Harris’s judgment when it comes to picking staff and advisors. While no candidate is perfect, it is essential for Harris to reevaluate her team selections and ensure that her campaign reflects integrity, fairness, and a commitment to engaging with voters in a meaningful way. As the election draws near, Harris must demonstrate strong leadership and judgment in navigating the challenges ahead.
